Public Knowledge is a Washington DC based public interest group working to defend your rights in the emerging digital culture.
In an ITIF report to be released, Duke Law School professors Stuart Benjamin and Arti Rai propose that the Obama administration (or Congress, if Congress is willing) create an Office of Innovation Policy that would draw upon, and feed into, existing regulatory review processes but would have the specific mission of being the “innovation champion” within these processes.
Please join use for a discussion of this new proposal to create an Office of Innovation Policy.
ITIF
1101 K Street, NW, Suite 610
Washington, DC
For more information and to RSVP please visit the event’s website.
![]() |
the PK crew and friends at CES 2008 Date: Jan 22, 2008Number of Photos in Album: 4 |
![]() |
Gadgets found at CES 2008 Location: las vegasDate: Jan 22, 2008 Number of Photos in Album: 6 |
There was a lot of talk last week regarding the proposition that strengthening copyright laws might be necessary to protect news sources from online “free riders.” Even our own Harold Feld chimed in, in this week's episode of "5 Minutes with Harold Feld". The flurry of commentary on this was owed in large part to a post by Judge Posner on his Becker-Posner Blog. The most relevant (and divisive) sentence in the post is the following:
Last week, the jury in the retrial of Ms. Jammie Thomas-Rasset found that the willful infringement of the copyrights of 24 songs—about 2 CDs worth—warrants the awarding of statutory damages of $1.92 million. That is $80,000 per song, a huge increase over the $220,000 awarded in the original Thomas trial. Given the massive sum awarded by the jury, Ms. Thomas-Rasset, a mother of two with modest means, will now likely spend the rest of her life in debt. At present, it seems that her only hope is a constitutional challenge to the damages award, which her legal team has already filed. The sheer magnitude of these damages has started a debate over statutory damages and whether they are just as currently applied by the courts. In this blog post, I will discuss two situations where these damages are currently being unjustly applied: suits against private citizens and suits against businesses.
You may have read recently that the US Supreme Court declined to take up the Cablevision case. This was where Hollywood studios and some cable networks sued Cablevision for providing essentially a network-based TiVo, where the programs that the subscriber requested to be recorded were saved on Cablevision’s servers, not on the box that sat atop their television. That the Court decided to let the appeals court’s decision stand — that Cablevision was not directly liable for public performances — is a good thing because it’s a ray of hope that lets online service providers know that (for now) they’re free to develop innovative “cloud-based” services. Which is where I come in…
Public Knowledge Legal Director Harold Feld was a guest on CNBC's "The Powergrid" earlier today. Harold debated talk radio host Ben Ferguson on the topic of competition in the wireless telecom marketplace and discussed the Department of Justice's recent announcement that it would review the business practices of major wireless carriers. A video clip of the segment can be found below (Adobe Shockwave required):
© 2009 Created by Alex Curtis on Ning. Create Your Own Social Network